Introducing Activation Atlases

Understanding what’s going on inside neural nets isn’t solely a question of scientific curiosity—our lack of understanding handicaps our ability to audit neural networks and, in high stakes contexts, ensure they are safe. Normally, if one was going to deploy a critical piece of software one could review all the paths through the code, or even do formal verification, but with neural networks, our ability to do this kind of review has presently been much more limited. With activation atlases humans can discover unanticipated issues in neural networks—for example, places where the network is relying on spurious correlations to classify images, or where re-using a feature between two classes leads to strange bugs. Humans can even use this understanding to “attack⁠(opens in a new window)” the model, modifying images to fool it.

For example, a special kind of activation atlas can be created to show how a network tells apart frying pans and woks. Many of the things we see are what one expects. Frying pans are more squarish, while woks are rounder and deeper. But it also seems like the model has learned that frying pans and woks can also be distinguished by food around them—in particular, wok is supported by the presence of noodles. Adding noodles to the corner of the image will fool the model 45% of the time! This is similar to work like adversarial patches⁠(opens in a new window), but based on human understanding.

• Ethics & Safety
• Language

Authors

Chris Olah, Ludwig Schubert

Acknowledgments

Thanks to our co-authors at Google: Shan Carter, Zan Armstrong and Ian Johnson.

Thanks to Greg Brockman, Dario Amodei, Jack Clark and Ashley Pilipiszyn for feedback on this blog post.

We also thank Christian Howard for his help in coordination from the Google side, Phillip Isola for being Distill’s acting editor and Arvind Satyanarayan for feedback on our paper.